Denmark Vs Sweden – COVID-19 Comparison
Summary: Both DK and SE
experienced economic “collapse of 29% and 25% respectively. Authors conclude
this magnitude of reduction occurred regardless of whether there were social
distancing and lockdowns in place. The main reason for SE not doing the same as
DK was due to historical attitudes to personal liberty and the legal system in
place compared to that in DK and little to do with either a desire for “Herd
Immunity”, As Swedes have always maintained, nothing to do with desire to leave
economy more opened out in SE and nothing related to population density
differences.
Adam Sheridan,
Asger Lau Andersen, Emil Toft Hansen, and Niels Johannesen (2020), “Social Distancing Laws Cause only Small Losses of Economic
Activity During the COVID-19 Pandemic in Scandinavia”. PNAS August 25,
2020 117 (34) 20468-20473;August 3, 2020; doi.org/10.1073/pnas.2010068117
www.pnas.org/content/117/34/20468
· DK & SE experienced very similar early
outbreak.
· Different legal system/laws in DK compared to
SE related to individual freedom.
· Reasonable to assume spending and disease
incidence would have evolved in same way as in Sweden, had Denmark not
introduced social distancing [SD] laws.
· Main finding: total consumer spending
dropped by ~ 25% in Sweden and due to their shutdown, by extra 4% in Denmark
due to their shutdown.
· Major cause of economic collapse in both
countries was similarly escalating Covid-19 outbreak.
· >> no meaningful
trade-off between saving lives and saving the economy.
· Different age group health
concerns in DK. where SD laws amplified spending drop (10% > SE) by young
people: DK shutdown attenuated drop in elderly (5% less than in SE)
· Age gradient suggests social distancing
reinforces drop for low-health-risk individuals but attenuates for high-risk
individuals by lowering overall prevalence of virus in society.
· Spending drops massively even when supply is
unconstrained and drop correlates strongly with health risk.
· Economic costs of a shutdown would most likely be
larger in younger countries.
Comments
Post a Comment